CS211: Advanced Computer Architecture



Projects Requirements and Format
 




 Objectives


The programming projects, using simplescalar, is intended to connect the theoretical concepts learnt in the lecture to real architectures and applications. Specifically, you will be exploring some of the solution techniques covered in class in the context of a 'real' processor and studying how the design affects the performance of an application. In the first two projects we will focus on the impact of branch prediction mechanisms and the cache organization on the performance of application benchmarks. The final project is more ambitious in scope and attempts to bring all the concepts and techniques together in searching for a (possibly hypothetical) optimal processor configuration for a set of benchmarks that you choose.

Requirements


 In the programming projects you are to use SimpleScalar to evaluate the performance of various benchmarks. It has already been installed in the computer lab in Academic Center 7th Floor, so all you have to do is download the benchmarks and use it. (For more info see the Simple Scalar Information link). Be sure to allow adequate time to run the simulations, analyze the results, and write a complete  readable report. It is suggested that you try to summarize data in a clear  manner using tables and/or graphs. Conciseness and results are more important than long descriptions of process. The grading will be based on the correctness, and completeness, of the experiments and the depth of your analysis.

Your reports (for Projects 1 and 2) are limited to 5 pages, using a 12 point font and 1.5 line spacing (you can use extra pages for figures if need be). The format of the report should follow the outline below:

1. Team Members/Authors

2. Abstract (summarize the report’s conclusions in 150 words or less)

3. Experiments: state what options you studied/ being studied, and what parameters you varied.

4. Results. (make sure you tabulate and analyze the results -- simply handing in the output of the simulations will result in a failing grade).

5. Conclusions (summarize critical results and key insights learned about the effect of the parameters examined on performance). Show the best performance (you have to figure out how you will measure the performance!)  you were able to obtain for each benchmark.

For project 3, the first four items above are the same BUT each team member has to provide their own analysis -- no collaboration is permitted. More details will be provided on the document describing Project 3.